![iasip am i gay for god iasip am i gay for god](https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840x2160/4806860-Mel-White-Quote-I-am-gay-I-am-proud-And-God-loves-me-without.jpg)
The answer to this is: We can't trust that our current theories are correct, and that is exactly what defines science.
![iasip am i gay for god iasip am i gay for god](https://www.john15.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/clouds.jpg)
For example modern cosmology's big-bang vs the Biblical and Quranic accounts of creation. It is still possible to argue that science and religion are both trying to answer the same or similar questions. See Stephen Gould's Non-overlapping magisteria or Karen Armstrong's distinction between Logos and Mythos. Many would argue that that is not the case. Can we believe certain scientific theories/results even if we personally don't understand most of the concepts/theories ourselves? Why? Isn't this similar to how people put their "faith" in god? Aren't we placing our "faith" on the experts?Īn initial note: To claim that science is "better" than religion implies that science is trying to answer the same questions as religion. Why is science better than religion even though the currently accepted scientific theory may be proven to be wrong in the future? How can we trust that our current theories aren't wrong? How does one counter these points? How do you show someone that this is false equivalency? We instinctively believe (most of us anyway) our scientists and domain experts, even if we don't understand the concepts ourselves. This is very similar to our relationship with science.
![iasip am i gay for god iasip am i gay for god](https://www.john15.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/man2-1.jpg)
IASIP AM I GAY FOR GOD MAC
Even science is not safe from science!Īnother argument that Mac made was that Dennis (another character in the show) hasn't personally seen dinosaur fossils yet believes they exist. I guess the argument can also be extended to dominant scientific theories being disproven time and time again. He starts by saying that the people we have thought to be the "smartest" through the ages made mistakes, and thus they were stupid and are not be trusted. I was watching this scene from " It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" where Mac (a character in the show) lays down "solid" arguments for why Science is similar to Religion. (I previously asked posted this in Skeptics SE but was told that this might be a better SE for my specific question.)